1 00:00:00,050 --> 00:00:05,809 which ensures the safety of the consumer all the online casinos inside the state list of safe 2 00:00:05,809 --> 00:00:12,449 camping sites are enforced to this your information in consciousness now let me remind you of our main 3 00:00:12,449 --> 00:00:17,570 arguments and why we stand against this notion first we have the mitigation of the states that 4 00:00:17,570 --> 00:00:22,769 can be only achieved by regulation when the us banned the consumption of alcohol during the 20s 5 00:00:23,489 --> 00:00:29,170 there was actually an increase in the consumption and however also the outcomes didn't stop at all 6 00:00:29,170 --> 00:00:35,490 might not have easier access to alcohol the prices increase and furthermore the lack of regulation 7 00:00:36,289 --> 00:00:44,130 make the quality of alcohol to decrease up to the point to recall itself as a poison 8 00:00:45,090 --> 00:00:51,969 so in opposition thanks to the legalization of the alcohol that would make that the consumers 9 00:00:51,969 --> 00:00:58,450 that are going to consume it either way is legal or not who would have been protected from the bad 10 00:00:58,450 --> 00:01:07,890 quality of the alcohol also would have better prices and the miners would have been protected 11 00:01:07,890 --> 00:01:15,010 from the easy access to alcohol our second point is the prophecy of the state because in 2021 the 12 00:01:15,010 --> 00:01:23,810 previous year the state gained 638 billion euros from the average of gambling including 427 13 00:01:23,810 --> 00:01:31,090 billions from common taxes and social contributions of the industry and over 15 000 jobs were created 14 00:01:31,090 --> 00:01:36,930 from this so the government is trying to move the only gamblers into physical casinos to take 15 00:01:36,930 --> 00:01:43,810 a bigger piece of the cake that gambling is but this wouldn't solve the problem as physical casinos 16 00:01:43,810 --> 00:01:51,489 have the same problems that normal casinos have yes which is the salary of the jobs that we raise 17 00:01:52,689 --> 00:02:02,689 it's normal salary that we have in spain like a standard 1500 or something like that so our 18 00:02:02,689 --> 00:02:08,849 objective must be releasing the number of numbers not to get advantage of it and our last argument 19 00:02:08,849 --> 00:02:13,090 is the loss of money for the state because as we have mentioned previously with this 20 00:02:13,090 --> 00:02:18,050 message the state will be looking forward to profit from compulsive cameras nothing less 21 00:02:18,050 --> 00:02:24,770 with this message spain will get into a corporate effect causing a big loss of money online gambling 22 00:02:24,770 --> 00:02:32,210 will use over 140 million euros from taxes we represent about a two percent of the gdp of spain 23 00:02:32,210 --> 00:02:40,210 The goal that we are trying is to move consumers from only casinos to physical casinos. 24 00:02:40,210 --> 00:02:42,210 But none of them will. 25 00:02:42,210 --> 00:02:48,210 And even if almost all of them move from only casinos to presential casinos, 26 00:02:48,210 --> 00:02:53,210 almost 0.1% of the GDP capital will be lost. 27 00:02:53,210 --> 00:02:57,210 And that will cost over 1.2 billion euros lost. 28 00:02:57,210 --> 00:03:01,210 Spain is entering a huge crisis and we cannot afford that. 29 00:03:01,210 --> 00:03:13,210 So for this reason, we should ban it and stay in the motion that we already have by regulating them for the future. 30 00:03:13,210 --> 00:03:20,210 And for this reason, it's clear that online gaming should be banned in Spain. 31 00:03:20,210 --> 00:03:22,210 Thank you.