1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:10,000 Environmental ethics is the branch of ethics that takes into account how human beings relate to the ecosystem we live in. 2 00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:17,000 The way we live in our ecosystem affects the way we interact with other people. 3 00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:21,000 Ecological problems create social problems. 4 00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:33,000 So we should adopt what we call an eco-social perspective, trying to understand both ecological problems and social problems, which are frequently interconnected. 5 00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:40,000 For example, global warming has forced millions of people to leave their countries and to find a new place to live. 6 00:00:40,000 --> 00:00:53,000 This means that an environmental problem can create a social and political problem, and only if we face both problems together can we imagine a solution for both of them. 7 00:00:53,000 --> 00:01:00,000 One way to think about this eco-social perspective is the ethics of care. 8 00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:05,000 The ethics of care was developed originally by Carol Gilligan. 9 00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:16,000 She thought that the ethics of justice that were generally developed in philosophy, in tradition, were not good enough. 10 00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:22,000 They insisted on how important it was to give each person what they deserve, which is quite true. 11 00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:32,000 But the ethics of justice sometimes forget how important care is, how important it is sometimes to take care of other people. 12 00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:36,000 And that's what Carol Gilligan invites us to do. 13 00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:54,000 She says that we should not only think about justice, we should also think about how taking care directly, in a proactive way, getting involved with other people's lives and trying to help them to improve their lives, taking care of them. 14 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:59,000 The same perspective can be adopted when we think about our planet. 15 00:01:59,000 --> 00:02:21,000 We should use the ethics of care in order to take care of our planet, in order to find a new way to live, in order to imagine a way of coexisting in society that can be sustainable in the future and that can ensure the future of our descendants, of our children and grandchildren. 16 00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:33,000 Some people even think that in order to preserve life on Earth, we should move from an anthropocentric vision to a biocentric vision. 17 00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:42,000 The anthropocentric vision, which has been dominant since the Renaissance times, thinks that human beings are the center of everything. 18 00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:48,000 In this anthropocentric vision, the most important thing is the human being. 19 00:02:48,000 --> 00:03:13,000 So, if you adopt this anthropocentric vision, you think that planet Earth, ecosystems, animals, minerals or water, all these things are resources, instruments that must be used to ensure that human lives are okay, that human beings live a good life, because the human life is the most important thing that we must consider. 20 00:03:13,000 --> 00:03:18,000 Some people think that this vision is a bit limited, is not correct. 21 00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:23,000 We should perhaps change our mind and adopt a biocentric vision. 22 00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:28,000 For the biocentric vision, the important thing is not just human life. 23 00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:31,000 The important thing is life in general. 24 00:03:31,000 --> 00:03:40,000 So, important as we are, we should also take care of plants, of trees, of animals, of all living creatures. 25 00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:42,000 So, the human being is not the center. 26 00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:44,000 The center should be life. 27 00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:58,000 And if the center is life, one of the consequences is that human beings must restrict their needs and their consumption in order to let other ways of life thrive and live prosperously in our planet.