1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,000 This is Tom Lineke with Mikhail Blesses from the MIT Media Lab, and we're talking about 2 00:00:07,000 --> 00:00:14,000 the $100 laptop for child project. And we've been talking about this on some other video 3 00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:21,000 blogs, by the way. The question I have, it has to do with the difference between good 4 00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:28,000 intentions and the net benefit that's delivered. And if I were a woman in Nepal living on $50 5 00:00:28,000 --> 00:00:35,000 a year, would I want other people to invest in a $100 laptop for my child? And my concern 6 00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:40,000 is Nicholas Negroponte is a very powerful and charismatic leader. His brother is the 7 00:00:40,000 --> 00:00:46,000 UN ambassador, John Negroponte. He knows Kofi Annan. And there's a tremendous upsurge of 8 00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:53,000 top-down technology and funding and political power behind this, which can be very positive. 9 00:00:53,000 --> 00:00:58,000 And the MIT Media Lab is developing some very innovative technology here. But when it actually 10 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:05,000 gets into the field, what's the feedback loop to know that this is a net beneficial activity? 11 00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:12,000 First of all, the laptop is not a top-down. We hate top-down. The thing that we are not 12 00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:17,000 going to do is go to a poor country and try to use any kind of political connection that 13 00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:23,000 says, you know, we think that the laptop is the best for you. This is a poor laptop. 14 00:01:23,000 --> 00:01:30,000 We chose, pretty much, a pile of cows from the beginning just to be geographically diverse, 15 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:37,000 to be big. So the expense for the laptop, it was made a big impact. It's a different 16 00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:44,000 thing talking about Nigeria, which has 120 million people and lots of coins. It's a different 17 00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:51,000 thing talking about Nepal. Very few people and very few natural resources. We don't think 18 00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:58,000 that the laptop is by itself a panacea or it's going to solve a lot of problems unless 19 00:01:58,000 --> 00:02:07,000 it goes into a more holistic, if you want, framework. You can't use the laptop in, you 20 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:13,000 know, Niger. I mean, you can use it in Nigeria. We think that we can use it in Nigeria and 21 00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:19,000 it's going to make a big difference in Nigeria. It's about time for Nigeria to be known in 22 00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:28,000 the internet for other things than Nigerian spam. But yes, putting it in Niger is going 23 00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:33,000 to be a lot more challenging. That's why we are not trying to do it immediately because 24 00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:40,000 we don't know exactly how to do it. On the other hand, we do believe that access to information 25 00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:55,000 does improve lives. We do believe that giving kids a platform on top of which they can practice 26 00:02:55,000 --> 00:03:02,000 instruction is learning, will improve education, whether the teachers are trained or not. It 27 00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:10,000 will do immensely more good if the teachers are trained, definitely. But it is a way also 28 00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:20,000 to get away from not having good teachers, good libraries, good materials, educational 29 00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:30,000 materials in a lot of places. Just the e-book mode is what gets industries of education 30 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:41,000 solved completely. We also think that in order to get yourself into the new era, you don't 31 00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:46,000 have to go through all the evolutionary stages. You don't have to go through everything that 32 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:52,000 the western world went through. So the laptop is a way for some of the kids to leapfrog 33 00:03:52,000 --> 00:04:02,000 into the new era. Now, are we absolutely positively sure that the laptop is going to have a positive 34 00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:09,000 effect on each and every one of the kids that it's going to get that? No. And I can't tell 35 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:13,000 that. But we think that it is going to have a positive effect to the majority. 36 00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:19,000 What's your feedback mechanism? How you evaluate this and know if you're going in a positive 37 00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:20,000 direction or not? 38 00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:27,000 That's a hard question. This is an educational project. And as an educational project, you 39 00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:32,000 either have to do testing at the end of the year, which we don't think that it's going 40 00:04:32,000 --> 00:04:42,000 to measure the qualities that the laptop is trying to instill on kids. And it's also driven 41 00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:47,000 by governments. And governments also have to show results in four-year periods in the 42 00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:52,000 good places of the world. In the bad places of the world, usually they don't care. So 43 00:04:52,000 --> 00:05:02,000 it is a hard question. And we're trying to put localized measures in place by the government 44 00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:08,000 itself. This is not something that we are going to go and tell them. Measure this. 45 00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:14,000 Now, I can give you some examples from the state of Maine. The state of Maine is probably 46 00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:20,000 the world's largest, not largest anymore because it's Marseille and other places, but it's 47 00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:26,000 a large one-laptop-per-child experiment. It has not been done in our ideal way. It's only 48 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:34,000 been done at grades six and seven. But one thing that is immediately obvious is that 49 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:41,000 language skills have improved, dieting skills have improved, because the kids have a lot 50 00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:52,000 more enticing ways to practice that. Truancy has gone up dramatically. And that's not something 51 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:53,000 that has been rare. 52 00:05:53,000 --> 00:05:54,000 Up or down? 53 00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:56,000 I mean, people don't drop out. 54 00:05:56,000 --> 00:05:57,000 Don't drop out, okay. 55 00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:06,000 Sorry, my English is not perfect. So those are not things that are measured by the standardized 56 00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:14,000 test. If they are measured, it takes time for that to seep in. So those are the things that 57 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:21,000 we want government to learn. And also the laptop at the end of the day, if you really 58 00:06:21,000 --> 00:06:28,000 want to be successful, it's not about teaching kids what they should know. It's teaching 59 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:36,000 them how to learn what they don't at the end. And that's what the piece that we are trying 60 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:40,000 to fill, that has not been filled by traditional education. 61 00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:45,000 So where is the content for this coming from? Is it being generated by the kids themselves? 62 00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:48,000 Do you have curriculum? Where is that coming from? 63 00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:58,000 You have to have curriculum. You have to have software. My favorite one, just because of 64 00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:02,000 my experience going through school, where I went through physics class, which was my 65 00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:10,000 favorite class, having done three experiments my whole school year. By having the virtual 66 00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:17,000 lab, the laptop, I think will do tremendous things for that kind of teaching. 67 00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:23,000 You also need multiple books, and we need to work on royalties there and things like 68 00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:31,000 that to get the content in place. And that solves the lack of materials to a large extent 69 00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:36,000 in the developing world, where most of the cost is actual distribution of physical books, 70 00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:43,000 which doesn't happen. And the third, my big hope, is make the kids develop content. I 71 00:07:43,000 --> 00:07:47,000 think that is really fundamental. That's the big win. 72 00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:54,000 Do you have any ideas for peer-to-peer learning models, a Lancaster method, or online where 73 00:07:54,000 --> 00:08:01,000 kids teach each other? Or you could have a tutor or mentor from MIT teaching a high school 74 00:08:01,000 --> 00:08:04,000 kid physics in Nigeria or whatever. 75 00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:11,000 That's tele-teaching, if you want. What I'm mostly concerned is the kids doing their homework, 76 00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:17,000 for example, in an apartment building or in a village somewhere, and being able to talk 77 00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:23,000 with each other and ask questions with each other. I think that teamwork is really important. 78 00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:29,000 I think it's also very important getting bigger assignments, that none of them can tackle 79 00:08:29,000 --> 00:08:33,000 one by one, and the laptop being the platform by which they collaborate. 80 00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:38,000 I see. Through a wiki-type model. And are these wikis shareable? Are they networkable? 81 00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:45,000 Yes, yes. That's the one piece that actually we are putting a lot of effort as OLPC, as 82 00:08:45,000 --> 00:08:53,000 a non-profit. We are actually putting resources into getting a nice, easy-to-use wiki platform 83 00:08:53,000 --> 00:09:00,000 on every laptop, so that 50 kids can actually publish immediately without having to go through 84 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:04,000 special servers, special publishing software, or anything like that. 85 00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:07,000 Do you have a video camera at all? 86 00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:11,000 That's the big fight, the internal fight right now. It's a bill of materials issue. 87 00:09:11,000 --> 00:09:16,000 We want to have a camera exactly for that reason. We have very good audio support, and 88 00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:19,000 we'll have voice over IP built in immediately. 89 00:09:19,000 --> 00:09:20,000 You do already? 90 00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:21,000 Yes, we have that. 91 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:23,000 So are you just adding video or not? 92 00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:30,000 The video piece is something that we banked. We had a lot of internal fights, and it's 93 00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:34,000 not even resolved yet. It's just that we don't have $4. 94 00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:36,000 $4 after the video? 95 00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:42,000 To spend for the video. I mean, when your total bill of materials is, it's about $120 96 00:09:42,000 --> 00:09:43,000 right now. 97 00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:44,000 I see. 98 00:09:44,000 --> 00:09:50,000 We are already over budget. $4 is a lot. And there are various trade-offs that you have 99 00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:58,000 to do. So one of the things that is, do we do double injection molding to put soft plastic 100 00:09:58,000 --> 00:10:04,000 around the edges so when the laptop drops, it becomes more durable, or we do the camera? 101 00:10:04,000 --> 00:10:10,000 Personally, being an engineer and being a geek, and Walter Benders, who is the president 102 00:10:10,000 --> 00:10:16,000 for software, the idea was to put the camera in there. It seems that the design people 103 00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:20,000 and the durability people are willing to argue. We had that specific idea. 104 00:10:20,000 --> 00:10:27,000 Yeah. Well, I guess part of me wants to say do both and start with a higher cost prototype 105 00:10:27,000 --> 00:10:30,000 that the cost will come down for the next generation. 106 00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:31,000 Yes, exactly. 107 00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:35,000 But open up the video channel so that you can talk about video conferencing. 108 00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:39,000 Not only video conferencing, but doing exactly what we have been doing right now. 109 00:10:39,000 --> 00:10:40,000 Yeah. 110 00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:45,000 And letting kids from each part of the world having these things available to other parts 111 00:10:45,000 --> 00:10:50,000 of the world. For that, we have the solution. I mean, Google is going to take care of that. 112 00:10:50,000 --> 00:10:54,000 In the Uplift Academy, we've had a number of people very interested in the educational 113 00:10:54,000 --> 00:11:02,000 model. Peer-to-peer teaching, mentoring programs where women can learn, can teach Spanish lessons 114 00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:08,000 over the web, for example. The classroom connection, global classroom connection is another theme 115 00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:14,000 that's come up, just connecting classrooms. So a northern classroom could talk to a Ugandan 116 00:11:14,000 --> 00:11:20,000 classroom or something like that. So there's a whole lot of interest in that. Are you opening 117 00:11:20,000 --> 00:11:23,000 this up? Would this be open channels for people to contribute? 118 00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:30,000 Yes, it's totally open. And whatever lack or perception of lack of openness exists right 119 00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:37,000 now has to do with the fact that we are 12 people working full-time on that. So our web 120 00:11:37,000 --> 00:11:42,000 publishing right now is not where it should have been, but we are doing it on our spare 121 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:50,000 time right now. But this is by definition an open program, and this is open for everybody 122 00:11:50,000 --> 00:11:57,000 to come in and contribute. We definitely have a few dogmas of our own. One of them is the 123 00:11:57,000 --> 00:12:04,000 One Laptop per Child principle. That's why we named the foundation One Laptop per Child. 124 00:12:04,000 --> 00:12:11,000 We think that's really important for this thing not to be a shared resource, to be given 125 00:12:11,000 --> 00:12:18,000 to the kids. That is going to solve the maintenance, most of the maintenance issues. Everything 126 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:23,000 else is pretty much built from the beginning to be open to participation. There's nothing 127 00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:29,000 to lock anybody from loading their software on it. I'm pretty sure that as soon as we 128 00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:34,000 come out and this thing gets deployed in large numbers in the immediate future, Microsoft 129 00:12:34,000 --> 00:12:38,000 will come out with an operating system to run on it, and we are perfectly fine with 130 00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:45,000 it. And we are perfectly fine with people contributing at all levels. We think that 131 00:12:45,000 --> 00:12:51,000 it's more important for this contribution not to happen at the LPC level, although we 132 00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:59,000 certainly will do anything to our abilities to consult with the government on how to use 133 00:12:59,000 --> 00:13:02,000 that, but to happen at the school level. 134 00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:07,000 Okay. And is there a platform that we can get started on and just kind of prototype 135 00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:12,000 some stuff? I mean, could we cobble together a wiki and a... 136 00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:15,000 You can go and contribute to our wiki right now. 137 00:13:15,000 --> 00:13:16,000 Okay. 138 00:13:16,000 --> 00:13:20,000 For people who want to port software and things like that, we have developer boards that we 139 00:13:20,000 --> 00:13:22,000 are making available already. 140 00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:26,000 Okay. Can you define any architecture at all to design to? 141 00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:34,000 We have defined what the software stack looks like. Again, we want to avoid obesity. 142 00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:35,000 Sure. 143 00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:41,000 So we are not trying to exclude anything from running on the laptop, but we have certain 144 00:13:41,000 --> 00:13:43,000 guidelines. 145 00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:44,000 That's on your website? 146 00:13:44,000 --> 00:13:53,000 That's on our website. So to give you an idea, we think that Python is the language that 147 00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:58,000 we are putting there. We are not putting Perl. We had talks with... 148 00:13:58,000 --> 00:14:00,000 Python. Yes, Python. 149 00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:07,000 We had a discussion. We said Python is the way to go. If we want to teach kids the programming 150 00:14:07,000 --> 00:14:14,000 language right now, that is going to be there. Certainly for younger kids, Lego and its derivatives 151 00:14:14,000 --> 00:14:15,000 will be there. 152 00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:16,000 That will be broken? 153 00:14:16,000 --> 00:14:19,000 Yeah. Scratch and Squeak and the stuff that Alan K. 154 00:14:19,000 --> 00:14:20,000 Alan K is... 155 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:21,000 Okay. 156 00:14:22,000 --> 00:14:23,000 Open Croquet? 157 00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:25,000 Yeah, things like that. 158 00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:28,000 Croquet? 159 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:33,000 I've heard the term. I'm not going to say that I know exactly what it is. 160 00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:35,000 Oh, it's a three-dimensional Squeak. 161 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:36,000 Okay. Yes. 162 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:40,000 But high-end graphics and visual three-dimensional virtual space. 163 00:14:40,000 --> 00:14:47,000 I don't know that. The reason is that I'm not sure how good we are in 3D graphics. There 164 00:14:47,000 --> 00:14:48,000 is no 3D. 165 00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:52,000 So, you're going to support Smalltalk and Python natively on the machine? 166 00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:53,000 Yes. 167 00:14:53,000 --> 00:14:56,000 Interesting. And what wiki format? 168 00:14:56,000 --> 00:15:02,000 The wiki format, again, is an open question right now. It seems that we will probably 169 00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:06,000 have to develop something ourselves so that it can be integrated. 170 00:15:06,000 --> 00:15:07,000 Yeah. 171 00:15:07,000 --> 00:15:10,000 So, it's the web server and the wiki. 172 00:15:10,000 --> 00:15:11,000 Okay. 173 00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:12,000 It's one and the same thing. 174 00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:14,000 And e-book format? Have you decided on that at all? 175 00:15:14,000 --> 00:15:15,000 Open document. 176 00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:16,000 Open document. 177 00:15:16,000 --> 00:15:19,000 PDF, unfortunately, from the beginning. 178 00:15:19,000 --> 00:15:20,000 PDF? Okay. 179 00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:26,000 I mean, PDF is much better than talk, word, format, etc., etc. 180 00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:34,000 But we are trying to be pretty adamant about doing things in open ways that it's not going 181 00:15:34,000 --> 00:15:36,000 to exclude anybody from playing. 182 00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:37,000 Okay. 183 00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:39,000 We are not going to support open office. 184 00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:40,000 Okay. 185 00:15:40,000 --> 00:15:42,000 We are not trying to turn kids into office workers. 186 00:15:42,000 --> 00:15:43,000 Yeah. 187 00:15:43,000 --> 00:15:44,000 Probably, I'll be worried. 188 00:15:44,000 --> 00:15:45,000 Yeah. 189 00:15:45,000 --> 00:15:47,000 It's going to be the world processor of choice. 190 00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:48,000 Okay. 191 00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:49,000 Well, it's a very exciting project. 192 00:15:49,000 --> 00:15:52,000 The more that I talk to you, the more interesting it sounds. 193 00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:58,000 And if there's anything I can do to help with you, I've got a meeting coming up right after 194 00:15:58,000 --> 00:16:00,000 the Wikimania in Boston, another workshop. 195 00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:02,000 Are you going to be there at Wikimania? 196 00:16:02,000 --> 00:16:03,000 Yeah, I'll be at Wikimania. 197 00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:07,000 Probably, we are going to host half of Wikimania at LBC. 198 00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:08,000 Okay. 199 00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:10,000 So, it's going to happen at our offices. 200 00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:11,000 Okay. 201 00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:13,000 And I'm going to talk to all of these people. 202 00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:14,000 Okay. 203 00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:17,000 Rolando, do you want to say anything real quick before we retire here? 204 00:16:17,000 --> 00:16:19,000 Well, I had just one thing that I wanted to say. 205 00:16:19,000 --> 00:16:23,000 I think besides the odds against this project and your... 206 00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:24,000 Is it centered? 207 00:16:24,000 --> 00:16:25,000 I don't know that. 208 00:16:25,000 --> 00:16:26,000 Yeah, it is. 209 00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:27,000 Yeah. 210 00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:28,000 Yeah, yeah. 211 00:16:28,000 --> 00:16:35,000 So, besides the odds against, as you pointed out, there are some question marks, I think 212 00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:39,000 the real value of this project is that it breaks a spell. 213 00:16:39,000 --> 00:16:47,000 It's the first real example for a project that tries to reverse a trend. 214 00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:50,000 And I think industry will somehow have to follow. 215 00:16:50,000 --> 00:16:55,000 Certainly, there's a trend, a natural trend towards lowering costs. 216 00:16:55,000 --> 00:16:58,000 I think this buys us maybe five years. 217 00:16:58,000 --> 00:16:59,000 I don't know. 218 00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:00,000 So, that's the real value.