1
00:00:03,890 --> 00:00:21,410
First of all, thank you for listening to our speech.

2
00:00:21,910 --> 00:00:24,949
Now I will end the debate by concluding the arguments of my group.

3
00:00:25,829 --> 00:00:27,890
The first arguments defended were from Manuel,

4
00:00:27,890 --> 00:00:33,310
who explains the negative efficiency of pedestrianation regarding mobility.

5
00:00:34,090 --> 00:00:39,189
This includes, because of the creation of new pedestrian areas,

6
00:00:39,710 --> 00:00:41,969
new and longer routes for going to places.

7
00:00:41,969 --> 00:00:46,969
and traffic jams caused by the low availability of routes for travelling.

8
00:00:47,630 --> 00:00:49,469
At the end, this will create more pollution.

9
00:00:50,450 --> 00:00:53,549
Moreover, it creates many problems regarding public transport.

10
00:00:54,210 --> 00:00:58,649
Here it talks about overcontentness in buses and trains

11
00:00:58,649 --> 00:01:04,189
and also about the thief that took advantage of the situation for stealing the others' belongings.

12
00:01:04,790 --> 00:01:10,290
Another point mentioned is the different problems of pollution areas in cities.

13
00:01:10,290 --> 00:01:21,510
In his point, he explained the damage made to the cities when foreign people travel to other places for tourism and they damage the pollution areas.

14
00:01:22,530 --> 00:01:28,569
Furthermore, Ainhoa said that pollution areas are better because they reduce air pollution.

15
00:01:28,569 --> 00:01:36,730
And Manuel reviewed these arguments, saying that traffic jams caused by the low availability of optional roads

16
00:01:36,730 --> 00:01:40,790
would create more pollution than a city with no election areas.

17
00:01:41,930 --> 00:01:49,829
The second argument defended were from Mara, who explained that public transport is reliable depending on the country.

18
00:01:49,829 --> 00:01:59,829
And here he states the example of Spain, where public transport is not reliable because it is not controlled.

19
00:01:59,829 --> 00:02:07,829
In addition, he states that if the definition increased, local people would be able to have cars.

20
00:02:07,829 --> 00:02:14,830
So they couldn't travel because public transport don't have direct routes for going to the places.

21
00:02:14,830 --> 00:02:18,830
As a result, they would have to emigrate to other places.

22
00:02:18,830 --> 00:02:25,830
Another point mentioned is that public transport is not accessible for people with reduced mobility.

23
00:02:25,830 --> 00:02:36,830
And here she states the example of the ETM buses of Madrid which don't have facilities for disabled people like rums or wheelchairs.

24
00:02:36,830 --> 00:02:48,830
One further explains that public transport is often overcrowded, and why this is inconvenient in cases like the pandemic, where the minimum distance is not respected.

25
00:02:48,830 --> 00:02:53,830
Finally, Martina said that contamination is caused by direct car use.

26
00:02:53,830 --> 00:03:03,830
And Mara, rebutting that argument, said that the tourists that travel to other countries throw litter to the streets, creating contamination.

27
00:03:03,830 --> 00:03:08,830
So not only the Narekar Jews did not create air pollution.

28
00:03:08,830 --> 00:03:10,830
Thank you for listening.