Activa JavaScript para disfrutar de los vídeos de la Mediateca.
EV 4ESO - 08 Kant's deontology - Contenido educativo
Ajuste de pantallaEl ajuste de pantalla se aprecia al ver el vídeo en pantalla completa. Elige la presentación que más te guste:
Kant's theory is deontological because it insists on our duties.
As you already know, Kant's ethical theory insists on the importance of universalization of your rules.
00:00:01
Kant's categorical imperative invites you to create rules that can really be universalizable
00:00:11
and that respect human dignity.
00:00:18
Actually, both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent.
00:00:22
Now, if you make rules that you can really want to be universalizable and that respect human dignity,
00:00:27
you are using a procedural ethics, an ethics that insists on how you make the rules.
00:00:35
This ethical theory is not consequentialist.
00:00:43
This is extremely important.
00:00:48
According to Kant, what is relevant in ethics is not the consequence of your action.
00:00:50
What is relevant is the rule, the intention of your action.
00:00:59
Then, there is a great contrast between Kant's theory and other theories such as, for example,
00:01:06
Bill's utilitarianism. As you will remember, Bill insisted on the consequences of your actions.
00:01:14
He thought that what is correct is what has good consequences, making people happy.
00:01:21
For Kant, this is not correct. The important thing in ethics, for Kant, is not the consequences of
00:01:29
your actions. The important thing is to do your duty. That is why we say that Kant's theory is
00:01:38
deontological. Deontology is a word that comes from Greek and refers to duties and obligations.
00:01:47
Kant thought that ethics is about doing what is your duty. Often, when we have to decide what to
00:01:55
do, there is a conflict between what we really want to do, what we would like to do, what we
00:02:05
feel like doing, and our obligation. For example, I would like to watch TV, but I know I have the
00:02:13
duty to study. There is a conflict between what I must do and what I want. Kant thought this is the
00:02:22
key point of morality, this conflict between what your inclination asks you to do and what your duty
00:02:32
tells you to do. And the right thing for Kant is always to do your duty. So the important thing
00:02:42
is not the consequence. The important thing is your obligation. Whenever you have this conflict,
00:02:50
Kant says, do your duty.
00:02:58
That is morally correct.
00:03:01
And how do you know what is your duty?
00:03:04
It's not that difficult.
00:03:07
Your duty, Kant says, is to respect the categorical imperative,
00:03:08
to follow norms that you can't really want to be universalizable,
00:03:14
to follow rules that respect human dignity.
00:03:19
Imagine, then, that you have to take a difficult decision that has bad consequences but that
00:03:23
corresponds to your duty.
00:03:34
What would Kant recommend you to do?
00:03:37
In this situation, Kant thought that you must always do your duty, regardless of the consequences
00:03:40
of your actions.
00:03:48
Why?
00:03:49
Because, Kant thought, you are responsible of your decision, you are responsible of doing
00:03:50
your duty or breaking it, but you are not responsible of the consequences of your action.
00:03:56
The consequences of your action go beyond your own capacity of decision.
00:04:03
What is correct is to do what is your duty, and the rest is not depending on you.
00:04:10
- Idioma/s:
- Autor/es:
- César Prestel
- Subido por:
- César Pedro P.
- Licencia:
- Reconocimiento - No comercial - Compartir igual
- Visualizaciones:
- 75
- Fecha:
- 5 de octubre de 2020 - 20:52
- Visibilidad:
- Público
- Centro:
- IES CERVANTES
- Duración:
- 04′ 19″
- Relación de aspecto:
- 1.78:1
- Resolución:
- 1280x720 píxeles
- Tamaño:
- 248.38 MBytes