Saltar navegación

Mock 4 Against 4 - Contenido educativo

Ajuste de pantalla

El ajuste de pantalla se aprecia al ver el vídeo en pantalla completa. Elige la presentación que más te guste:

Subido el 12 de enero de 2023 por Patricia A.

5 visualizaciones

Más información Transcripción

Descargar la transcripción

Hello, my name is Mariela, and I'm in charge of my team's concussion. 00:00:00
We've had an intense debate here today, with good arguments on both sides, 00:00:03
although ours are more convincing. 00:00:07
Let me address first some of the things that we have said. 00:00:09
First, they've argued that online gambling is more addictive, 00:00:12
but addicts would do anything they need to do to satisfy their needs. 00:00:15
So if I did, I wouldn't do anything. There would be no change. 00:00:19
Secondly, they claim that one of the consequences would be that it would lead to a poor society. 00:00:23
However, we established that deaths don't come just from online casinos, but also from the physical ones, so, again, there would be no difference. 00:00:29
We also said that by legalizing it and not banning it, we would worsen its effects. 00:00:38
Nonetheless, we contraried that regulation would let two safe spaces to gamble online, protecting composing gamers and their consumers in general. Banning it would make it worse. 00:00:44
Finally, let me also remind you that we've clearly established why banning it would mean ignoring all the problems that online gambling causes, such as compulsory gambler's treatment. 00:00:55
We've also responded to your criticism, and we've clearly shown why our points are more compelling. 00:01:07
First, the mitigation of harm can only be achieved through regulation. 00:01:13
Regulations might not be perfect, but they do achieve the objectives we have been looking for. 00:01:17
Protecting the consumer, not taking advantage of them. 00:01:23
If online gambling were banned, people would have to resort to illegal sites, 00:01:26
which would be of easier access for compulsive gamblers, but still unsafe against camps. 00:01:30
We have exemplified this through how the US prohibition to do work in opposition to crime regulations. 00:01:35
Second, we have workers of the state. 00:01:41
There's a huge difference between the earnings of the state from physical and online consumers, 00:01:44
the first one being the most profitable one. But it would be nothing but another proof that the 00:01:48
aim of the state with this is to help itself with more money, not caring if it increases online 00:01:54
gambling rates. And, finally, lots of money for the state. Despite the government's intentions, 00:02:00
it will have a huge impact on the economy. Online gambling makes up around 2% of the GDP in taxes, 00:02:06
and taking that quantity away would be no benefit, especially now that Spain is entering a huge crisis. 00:02:13
Even if we should focus our efforts on stopping addiction, our economy is not able to take that short a chance all at once, 00:02:20
and instead, we should focus all our efforts on regulating the immune barrier. 00:02:27
Both our economy and our composed gambit will appreciate it. 00:02:31
So, to the motion, our answer is definitely not. 00:02:35
We have clearly proved so by talking about the mitigation of harm, the hypocrisy of the state, and the loss of money for the government. 00:02:39
But an online game game may or may not come from a noble objective, but it will undoubtedly release all the cover that society is trying to eliminate. 00:02:45
Thank you. 00:02:54
Idioma/s:
en
Autor/es:
IES Joaquin Araujo
Subido por:
Patricia A.
Licencia:
Todos los derechos reservados
Visualizaciones:
5
Fecha:
12 de enero de 2023 - 15:05
Visibilidad:
Clave
Centro:
IES JOAQUIN ARAUJO
Duración:
02′ 58″
Relación de aspecto:
1.78:1
Resolución:
1920x1080 píxeles
Tamaño:
366.29 MBytes

Del mismo autor…

Ver más del mismo autor

EducaMadrid, Plataforma Educativa de la Comunidad de Madrid

Plataforma Educativa EducaMadrid