Resolución simulacro RRHH (SIN SONIDO)
Ajuste de pantallaEl ajuste de pantalla se aprecia al ver el vídeo en pantalla completa. Elige la presentación que más te guste:
you
00:04:05
Antonio,
00:10:28
where you said that it is paid at the end of July, it would not be at the end of, well,
00:14:57
the month of July would not be instead of July it would be the month of August that is paid in September
00:15:04
not good and the one of August is paid if you finish working in August you would pay in September
00:15:09
ah ok because you have said it or July
00:15:20
ok ok ok yes sorry then the answer with respect to the quote what would it be and
00:15:25
and get paid for it, what would be the answer?
00:15:38
Yes, yes, yes.
00:15:41
Yes, the only thing I didn't know is if we had to include both parties.
00:16:52
Simply by saying that we have to pay the part that corresponds to social security
00:16:55
for that worker, or we would have to put both parties,
00:17:01
both the one that corresponds to the company and the employee.
00:17:05
Last question, excuse me.
00:17:08
Sorry, the high in social security has to be prior to the employee starting to work.
00:19:42
57.53, José Antonio.
00:24:35
en nueve mil cuatrocientos noventa y dos con cuarenta y cinco nueve mil nueve mil cuatrocientos
00:34:13
noventa y dos con cuarenta y cinco céntimos de dónde salen los 165 vale gracias
00:34:27
you
00:36:13
you
00:36:43
you
00:37:13
you
00:37:43
you
00:38:13
you
00:38:43
you
00:39:13
you
00:39:43
you
00:40:13
you
00:40:43
you
00:41:13
you
00:41:43
you
00:42:13
Thank you very much.
00:42:43
Yes, sorry, can we do it with a rule of three or do we have to apply the two with five days a month?
00:43:11
The same, it gives you the same.
00:43:23
Okay, but nothing happens, right?
00:43:25
Okay.
00:43:27
Thank you.
00:44:20
866, yes, 826.87, less, charge less, if I charged how much, Antonio, I would charge 650, I would charge less, with the payroll, please.
00:44:50
José Antonio, ¿por qué la base de cotización sale en 2086 cuando has sacado tú para la
00:56:03
cotización de 1986,25?
01:00:19
¿Pero de dónde te sale el 1986,25?
01:00:38
Ah, pero...
01:00:56
Sí, pero...
01:00:57
Me sigo liando.
01:01:05
porque te veo que has puesto
01:01:07
1986.25
01:01:08
por 2 entre 2
01:01:11
Claro, disculpa
01:01:12
eso es la
01:01:15
No, no, no, no, explícaselo tú
01:01:17
Thank you.
01:02:20
face to the exam to see here is that I realize that I
01:02:50
I lied because you the fact that you put salary base 14 pay antiquity 14
01:02:55
you pay with this you give us to understand that we have to include to remove the
01:03:01
prorata the antiquity
01:03:06
of course and I did not just catch this in this way then of course if you say
01:03:09
se incluye para va incluida la antigüedad sabes no sé pues me lia y ya
01:03:16
voy de cuenta que tú pones 14 pagas para que nosotros
01:03:23
entendamos que tenemos que incluirla a la hora de la prórroga claro
01:03:27
I don't understand this, oh my god, they don't want to give any, imagine, 1639.58, no, 1690,
01:03:47
40.45
01:04:49
Well, I did something wrong
01:04:53
José Antonio, I get
01:05:09
in the total
01:05:11
of the deductions
01:05:13
446.67
01:05:15
446.67
01:05:17
No. Yes?
01:05:21
300, I think so
01:05:27
239
01:05:33
Yes
01:05:35
Yes, 395, you're right.
01:05:54
- Subido por:
- Jose Antonio A.
- Licencia:
- Reconocimiento - No comercial - Compartir igual
- Visualizaciones:
- 5
- Fecha:
- 3 de mayo de 2024 - 7:54
- Visibilidad:
- Clave
- Centro:
- IES LAZARO CARDENAS
- Duración:
- 1h′ 09′ 42″
- Relación de aspecto:
- 1.89:1
- Resolución:
- 1376x728 píxeles
- Tamaño:
- 105.83 MBytes
