Saltar navegación

Mock Against 1.5 - Contenido educativo

Ajuste de pantalla

El ajuste de pantalla se aprecia al ver el vídeo en pantalla completa. Elige la presentación que más te guste:

Subido el 20 de diciembre de 2022 por Patricia A.

5 visualizaciones

Más información Transcripción

Descargar la transcripción

Good arguments on both sides, or the arts from a good point of view. 00:00:00
If art doesn't exist, art services are accessible, and like anyone, they can't do it. 00:00:03
But we've shown that art needs to do nothing, and it needs to reach content to satisfy their needs. 00:00:07
Because if you don't create, you have to go to the museum and see if it's because they have an addiction. 00:00:13
Also, they said that they didn't increase their addiction. 00:00:17
Nonetheless, a counter-argument that online museums cause too much addiction, 00:00:21
that's because of what it is, so there's a point in that. 00:00:26
Finally, we also claim that there is a lack of security, but we established that you need enemies for entering casinos, so in the end, you have to get away from the only casino. 00:00:28
Let me also remind you that we were going to ask a question to the other team, but they were too afraid to take it because we had only two minutes left. 00:00:39
We've also responded to your criticism, and we've clearly shown why our points are more compelling. 00:00:46
First, the mitigation of harm can only pitch you through regulation. Regulations might not be perfect, but they do achieve the objective they are aiming for. 00:00:50
they are aiming for, protecting the consumer, not taking advantage of them. 00:00:57
If online gambling were banned, we would have to restore it to a legal status. 00:01:00
We would be of easier access for compulsive gamblers, but still unsafe against scams. 00:01:04
We have exemplified this through how the US prohibition didn't work in opposition to current regulations. 00:01:08
Second, the progress of the state. 00:01:14
There is a huge difference between the arrangements of the state for physical and online gambling, 00:01:16
the first one being more profitable. 00:01:20
Money would mean nothing but another group that the state is only aiming to help serve with more money, not carrying a huge increase in online gambling on the way. 00:01:22
And finally, less money for the state. 00:01:30
Despite the government's intentions, it will have a huge impact on our economy. 00:01:32
Online gambling makes up around 2% of GDP in taxes, and taking that quantity of money away is no benefit, especially now that Spain is entering a huge crisis. 00:01:37
Even if we should focus on stopping addiction, our economy is not able to take that short 00:01:47
of funds all at once, and instead we should focus our efforts into regulating gaming better. 00:01:52
Both our economy and our composite gamers will appreciate it. 00:01:57
So, to the motion, our answer is definitely not. 00:02:01
We have further crossed that by talking about the mitigation of harm that can only be achieved 00:02:05
through regulation, the hypocrisy of the state, and also the loss of money for the government 00:02:09
and therefore to the society. 00:02:13
But the online gaming may or may not come from a noble objective, but it will undoubtedly 00:02:15
release all the cover society is trying to eliminate. 00:02:20
Thank you. 00:02:23
Idioma/s:
en
Autor/es:
IES Joaquín Araújo
Subido por:
Patricia A.
Licencia:
Todos los derechos reservados
Visualizaciones:
5
Fecha:
20 de diciembre de 2022 - 6:59
Visibilidad:
Clave
Centro:
IES JOAQUIN ARAUJO
Duración:
02′ 28″
Relación de aspecto:
1.78:1
Resolución:
1920x1080 píxeles
Tamaño:
303.78 MBytes

Del mismo autor…

Ver más del mismo autor

EducaMadrid, Plataforma Educativa de la Comunidad de Madrid

Plataforma Educativa EducaMadrid